<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connecticut must Ban Outdoor Wood Furnaces if  People&#8217;s Health is to be  Protected, By Nancy Alderman, EHHI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://environmentalheadlines.com/ct/2010/02/02/connecticut-must-ban-outdoor-wood-furnaces-if-peoples-health-is-to-be-protected-by-nancy-alderman-ehhi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://environmentalheadlines.com/ct/2010/02/02/connecticut-must-ban-outdoor-wood-furnaces-if-peoples-health-is-to-be-protected-by-nancy-alderman-ehhi/</link>
	<description>Links to all of today&#039;s environmental news headlines in Connecticut.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:08:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnviroWhacko</title>
		<link>http://environmentalheadlines.com/ct/2010/02/02/connecticut-must-ban-outdoor-wood-furnaces-if-peoples-health-is-to-be-protected-by-nancy-alderman-ehhi/comment-page-1/#comment-10249</link>
		<dc:creator>EnviroWhacko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentalheadlines.com/ct/?p=28349#comment-10249</guid>
		<description>Since it is impossible to police the actual type of fuel burned in so-called outdoor &quot;wood&quot; furnaces, the only viable solution would be to outright ban them altogether. The product patent itself should be revoked also. There should never have been a patent issued for such a poorly-designed device. These problematic machines make Toyota&#039;s gas-petal problem look minor by comparison. (At least they are doing something about that.)

I would suggest a letter-writing campaign to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, demanding that these unsafe, health-hazardous products be removed from the marketplace at the federal level. This is a regulatory issue, not a legislative one.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpsc.gov/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cpsc.gov/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it is impossible to police the actual type of fuel burned in so-called outdoor &#8220;wood&#8221; furnaces, the only viable solution would be to outright ban them altogether. The product patent itself should be revoked also. There should never have been a patent issued for such a poorly-designed device. These problematic machines make Toyota&#8217;s gas-petal problem look minor by comparison. (At least they are doing something about that.)</p>
<p>I would suggest a letter-writing campaign to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, demanding that these unsafe, health-hazardous products be removed from the marketplace at the federal level. This is a regulatory issue, not a legislative one.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cpsc.gov/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
